After a year of institutionalizing red-tagging through the contested Anti-Terror Law, peasant groups continuous to parade the streets under terror law implementation, unifying their calls to denounce state-sponsored attacks, and demand pro-farmer policies.
The skyrocketing cases of harassment such as red-tagging insinuated by the Duterte regime provoked farmers to take their dissents to the streets.
For the peasants, the driving force to be an activist is the systemic oppression they have been enduring for decades—the innate feudal system in which farmers are victims of the hacienda system, one main reason why they still remain landless up to this very day. A systemic oppression that demands systemic solutions.
Despite being the most important producers in the country, Duterte paid no attention to their call to prioritize agriculture. Duterte’s criminal negligence sounded the alarm for the whole peasantry to oppose his poorly-led and militaristic COVID19 response. Agriculture has been overlooked for such a long time that it eventually developed several problems along with the pandemic burden.
Not only laws are weaponized as offensives to keep their mouth shut but the puppetry of landlords to capitalists seem to make it more violent. For critics conscious of the outmoded framework, they believe that there is more to see than just the backward system of farming.
The oppressed peasantry is eager to protest and exhaust ways to amplify calls to junk terror law, demand for genuine agrarian reform, and call to implement of pro-farmer policies.
Clearly, the fight was deemed to be a selfless choice, that the choice they make is grounded from a unified voice in the hopes of getting heard by an administration playing blind-deaf.
The struggle roots from the history of injustices, and has amplified now that agriculture is so overlooked by a regime that is fully invested in guns more than farmers. It has a history of neglect, that farmers carry the burden of inadequate government support, red-tagging, and repressive policies.
In response to the peasants’ outcry, the Rice Liberalization Law has been ratified with a promise of making the local rice production more competitive, only to know that just it allowed big corporations to monopolize the local market.
But what has actually been addressed with these policies? There is no advantage. In fact, the problem has been so real that it rippled its effects in every existing sector. There is more to see than just the price of 7 pesos per kilo; farmers tilling a land they do not own.
There is more to see than just farmers being left out, because the problem lies in the ineffective structural policies. The pandemic and the absence of government response has claimed sa much from farmers, and so the fight must continue.

You must be logged in to post a comment.